Saturday, June 20, 2015

Dylann Roof's Manifesto Released

Dylann Roof's manifesto was released. (Do other races ever release manifestos? Seems like such a White thing.)

Is is interesting that people on the Right are trying to claim that Dylann was obviously insane or on drugs. But the manifesto did not really seem like the rant of an insane man. The motivation of his attack was clear - he felt his people were under attack and he had an obligation to strike back.

It is also interesting that he was not raised "racist". His racial views were formed based on his real life experience with African Americans.

If the government was smart they would cease trying to demonize Whites. If they had a program of treating people equally this would defuse much of the anger. But the Left is never smart.

I am sure that the Left will respond with even greater anti-White rhetoric and calls for censorship. More classroom material will be aimed at degrading and humiliating White kids. This will only increase tensions and create more kids like Dylann Roof.

Most of the young generation is extremely obedient and passive. But there is a core of these kids who are extremely radical and hard core. We see this in politically correct countries like Britain in which many young kids are joining ISIS. Unfortunately for the establishment, not every White kid will turn gay and submissive.

The Manifesto unedited:

I was not raised in a racist home or environment. Living in the South, almost every White person has a small amount of racial awareness, simply beause of the numbers of negroes in this part of the country. But it is a superficial awareness. Growing up, in school, the White and black kids would make racial jokes toward each other, but all they were were jokes. Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that “blacks were the real racists” and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it.

The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case. I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up. I read the Wikipedia article and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right. But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words “black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries. Again I found myself in disbelief. As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there. From here I found out about the Jewish problem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.


I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have the most real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans.

Niggers are stupid and violent. At the same time they have the capacity to be very slick. Black people view everything through a racial lense. Thats what racial awareness is, its viewing everything that happens through a racial lense. They are always thinking about the fact that they are black. This is part of the reason they get offended so easily, and think that some thing are intended to be racist towards them, even when a White person wouldnt be thinking about race. The other reason is the Jewish agitation of the black race.

Black people are racially aware almost from birth, but White people on average dont think about race in their daily lives. And this is our problem. We need to and have to.

Say you were to witness a dog being beat by a man. You are almost surely going to feel very sorry for that dog. But then say you were to witness a dog biting a man. You will most likely not feel the same pity you felt for the dog for the man. Why? Because dogs are lower than men.

This same analogy applies to black and White relations. Even today, blacks are subconsciously viewed by White people are lower beings. They are held to a lower standard in general. This is why they are able to get away with things like obnoxious behavior in public. Because it is expected of them.

Modern history classes instill a subconscious White superiority complex in Whites and an inferiority complex in blacks. This White superiority complex that comes from learning of how we dominated other peoples is also part of the problem I have just mentioned. But of course I dont deny that we are in fact superior.

I wish with a passion that niggers were treated terribly throughout history by Whites, that every White person had an ancestor who owned slaves, that segregation was an evil an oppressive institution, and so on. Because if it was all it true, it would make it so much easier for me to accept our current situation. But it isnt true. None of it is. We are told to accept what is happening to us because of ancestors wrong doing, but it is all based on historical lies, exaggerations and myths. I have tried endlessly to think of reasons we deserve this, and I have only came back more irritated because there are no reasons.

Only a fourth to a third of people in the South owned even one slave. Yet every White person is treated as if they had a slave owning ancestor. This applies to in the states where slavery never existed, as well as people whose families immigrated after slavery was abolished. I have read hundreds of slaves narratives from my state. And almost all of them were positive. One sticks out in my mind where an old ex-slave recounted how the day his mistress died was one of the saddest days of his life. And in many of these narratives the slaves told of how their masters didnt even allowing whipping on his plantation.

Segregation was not a bad thing. It was a defensive measure. Segregation did not exist to hold back negroes. It existed to protect us from them. And I mean that in multiple ways. Not only did it protect us from having to interact with them, and from being physically harmed by them, but it protected us from being brought down to their level. Integration has done nothing but bring Whites down to level of brute animals. The best example of this is obviously our school system.

Now White parents are forced to move to the suburbs to send their children to “good schools”. But what constitutes a “good school”? The fact is that how good a school is considered directly corresponds to how White it is. I hate with a passion the whole idea of the suburbs. To me it represents nothing but scared White people running. Running because they are too weak, scared, and brainwashed to fight. Why should we have to flee the cities we created for the security of the suburbs? Why are the suburbs secure in the first place? Because they are White. The pathetic part is that these White people dont even admit to themselves why they are moving. They tell themselves it is for better schools or simply to live in a nicer neighborhood. But it is honestly just a way to escape niggers and other minorities.

But what about the White people that are left behind? What about the White children who, because of school zoning laws, are forced to go to a school that is 90 percent black? Do we really think that that White kid will be able to go one day without being picked on for being White, or called a “white boy”? And who is fighting for him? Who is fighting for these White people forced by economic circumstances to live among negroes? No one, but someone has to.

Here I would also like to touch on the idea of a Norhtwest Front. I think this idea is beyond stupid. Why should I for example, give up the beauty and history of my state to go to the Norhthwest? To me the whole idea just parralells the concept of White people running to the suburbs. The whole idea is pathetic and just another way to run from the problem without facing it.

Some people feel as though the South is beyond saving, that we have too many blacks here. To this I say look at history. The South had a higher ratio of blacks when we were holding them as slaves. Look at South Africa, and how such a small minority held the black in apartheid for years and years. Speaking of South Africa, if anyone thinks that think will eventually just change for the better, consider how in South Africa they have affirmative action for the black population that makes up 80 percent of the population.

It is far from being too late for America or Europe. I believe that even if we made up only 30 percent of the population we could take it back completely. But by no means should we wait any longer to take drastic action.

Anyone who thinks that White and black people look as different as we do on the outside, but are somehow magically the same on the inside, is delusional. How could our faces, skin, hair, and body structure all be different, but our brains be exactly the same? This is the nonsense we are led to believe.

Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals. These three things alone are a recipe for violent behavior. If a scientist publishes a paper on the differences between the races in Western Europe or Americans, he can expect to lose his job. There are personality traits within human families, and within different breeds of cats or dogs, so why not within the races?

A horse and a donkey can breed and make a mule, but they are still two completely different animals. Just because we can breed with the other races doesnt make us the same.

In a modern history class it is always emphasized that, when talking about “bad” things Whites have done in history, they were White. But when we lern about the numerous, almost countless wonderful things Whites have done, it is never pointed out that these people were White. Yet when we learn about anything important done by a black person in history, it is always pointed out repeatedly that they were black. For example when we learn about how George Washington carver was the first nigger smart enough to open a peanut.

On another subject I want to say this. Many White people feel as though they dont have a unique culture. The reason for this is that White culture is world culture. I dont mean that our culture is made up of other cultures, I mean that our culture has been adopted by everyone in the world. This makes us feel as though our culture isnt special or unique. Say for example that every business man in the world wore a kimono, that every skyscraper was in the shape of a pagoda, that every door was a sliding one, and that everyone ate every meal with chopsticks. This would probably make a Japanese man feel as though he had no unique traditional culture.

I have noticed a great disdain for race mixing White women within the White nationalists community, bordering on insanity it. These women are victims, and they can be saved. Stop.


Unlike many White naitonalists, I am of the opinion that the majority of American and European jews are White. In my opinion the issues with jews is not their blood, but their identity. I think that if we could somehow destroy the jewish identity, then they wouldnt cause much of a problem. The problem is that Jews look White, and in many cases are White, yet they see themselves as minorities. Just like niggers, most jews are always thinking about the fact that they are jewish. The other issue is that they network. If we could somehow turn every jew blue for 24 hours, I think there would be a mass awakening, because people would be able to see plainly what is going on.

I dont pretend to understand why jews do what they do. They are enigma.


Hispanics are obviously a huge problem for Americans. But there are good hispanics and bad hispanics. I remember while watching hispanic television stations, the shows and even the commercials were more White than our own. They have respect for White beauty, and a good portion of hispanics are White. It is a well known fact that White hispanics make up the elite of most hispanics countries. There is good White blood worht saving in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and even Brasil.

But they are still our enemies.

East Asians

I have great respent for the East Asian races. Even if we were to go extinct they could carry something on. They are by nature very racist and could be great allies of the White race. I am not opposed at all to allies with the Northeast Asian races.


I hate the sight of the American flag. Modern American patriotism is an absolute joke. People pretending like they have something to be proud while White people are being murdered daily in the streets. Many veterans believe we owe them something for “protecting our way of life” or “protecting our freedom”. But im not sure what way of life they are talking about. How about we protect the White race and stop fighting for the jews. I will say this though, I myself would have rather lived in 1940’s American than Nazi Germany, and no this is not ignorance speaking, it is just my opinion. So I dont blame the veterans of any wars up until after Vietnam, because at least they had an American to be proud of and fight for.

An Explanation

To take a saying from a film, “I see all this stuff going on, and I dont see anyone doing anything about it. And it pisses me off.”. To take a saying from my favorite film, “Even if my life is worth less than a speck of dirt, I want to use it for the good of society.”.

I have no choice. I am not in the position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country. We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.

Unfortunately at the time of writing I am in a great hurry and some of my best thoughts, actually many of them have been to be left out and lost forever. But I believe enough great White minds are out there already.

Please forgive any typos, I didnt have time to check it.


  1. The left will, as usual, overplay this. What he did was reprehensible and whatever his motivations inexcusable. But outside of Blacks and SJW his manifesto will resonate as familiar; familiar to their own experiences and observations. The growing anger on the part of non Blacks towards Blacks and their organ grinders is not "prejudice" but rather "postjudice" . A position arrived at through years or even decades of interactions and observations.

  2. The manifesto is crude but it does speak to some truths.

    The kid obviously had problems and what he did was horrific and inexcusable, but he brought up a lot of salient points about racial problems in this country.

    I would say Breivik did the smarter thing by attacking the elites themselves. That way, he could pose as the underdog fighting privilege and couldn't directly be accused of 'racism' since his targets were offsprings of rich Norwegians.

    In contrast, Dylann didn't target the SWPL Libs but blacks. Also, he targeted black churchgoers which doesn't make much sense since the real ugliness and filth and hatred of the black community is found among gangbangers and rappers. But then, maybe his logic was gangbangers and rappers don't need to be shot at since they are too busy shooting and killing one another, as in Baltimore.
    Baltimore is a place where the mayor said blacks should be allowed to run wild and loot and burn things down because they are angry. I guess the same logic doesn't apply to angry white kids.

    When we see the violence in Gaza, it seems it's perfectly okay for Zionists to kill and maim thousands of Palestinian women and children because some home-made rockets were shot at Israel. But white victims of black thuggery, rape, and robbery are supposed to just take all the attacks.

    Dylann bought into some white supremacist thinking, but that's where he made his mistake. He should have emphasized that the problem of America is black supremacism and Jewish supremacism. Blacks are supremacist toward whites because they know they are more muscular and stronger and more aggressive. They know that whites are afraid of them. Blacks know that they can kick white boy's ass, and they know white girls have lost respect for white men. White girls are addicted to rap music and jungle fever and come over to blacks. So, blacks feel supremacist and arrogant. Blacks may be inferior generally in IQ, but they are superior in areas that a barbarized America prize most: athletics, funky music, and humping women. Dylann did mention higher testosterone and lower impulse control, but he left out that blacks are indeed more muscular and stronger, and this has a huge impact on social reality.

    As for Jews, they control the media and have suppressed the extent of black-on-white crime to perpetuate the cult of 'white guilt'.

    Anyway, he acted crazily than working on his ideas, organizing a movement, and spreading awareness. And shooting up church people is simply bad press.

  3. Btw, the kid was mentally unbalanced and on drugs.

    But even crazy people can be right.

    Travis Bickle was nuts in Taxi Driver, but he was also right that NY in the 70s was a cesspool.

  4. The 'Manifesto' was just about 100% spot-on, and for a kid who has just been through the Liberal educational system - well written.
    Ramz - you hit so many nails so squarely on the head I don't know where to start.

  5. This will only increase tensions and create more kids like Dylann Roof.

    Yes. It's important to know that kids like Roof are entirely products of the toxic anti-White environment created by the Left and their pet Orcs.

  6. We have the same problem in Europe, caused by massive immigration. Immigration originates ghettos and ghettos originate problems.

    For example, in Spain we have gone from 0'5% immigration in 1980 to 12'2% in 2012 (official data; unofficial, adding illegals and nationalized immigrants, must be about 15%). And that is outrageous.

    In a few years, our politicians have created a grave problem in Europe, allowing millions of immigrants to come here.

    We have also the problem of traitors: social justice warriors or leftists that defend the massive influx of immigrants. I don't know in other countries, but here in Spain we must be the dumbest people in the continent; SJW said that immigrants came here to pay our pensions and to rejuvenate our population, but immigrants are on food stamps, free healthcare, free money from the state, especially if they are a large family, free food an free clothing from non governmental organizations, all payed by national whites, etcetera. Add to that problem that immigrants are illegally employed to a great extent, so they don't pay taxes, don't consume too much, so they don't add to the country's economy, and they send some money abroad, money that will be lost forever.

    So they came here to pay our pensions, but they are costing us a lot of money because we have to pay them all their stuff.

    So they came here to pay our pensions, but they are costing us a lot of money because we have to pay them all their stuff.

    We, Spaniards, can barely provide for our children, we can afford only two children on average, but immigrants don't stop having children and getting free money and free schooling for their children, and other advantages, so we, dumb Spaniards, are paying for our children and for their children. We are financing our own demise! We are paying for getting invaded! We are paying our Muslim enemies and others to be invaded again.

    Shame on you, Spain. We fought against the Muslims for eight centuries to expel them from our country and now we are paying them to invade us again. And funny thing is, SJW leftists say that we must respect their customs and we must adapt to them, not the other way around.

    But there is still hope; a lot of our youngsters are starting to realize all this crap. I foresee a new war in Europe in a few years. A racial and cultural war. Remember what happened in France with 3rd generation immigrants a few years ago. Remember what happened in Yugoslavia, and they were all white Slavs, but with different nationalities, religions and cultures.

    As you say, Ramzpaul, we need nationalism. And we need homogeneity.

  7. But here’s the thing that most people are missing. They approach this issue from idea-centrism instead of reality-centrism. They suppose that Dylann was primarily motivated by ideas than by reality.

    If we can believe him, Dylann says he got interested in racial issues because of
    (1) the reality he saw all around him in integrated South Carolina
    (2) the coverage of the Trayvon Martin case that made no sense to him(as it shouldn’t have cuz the media narrative of a ‘white southerner’ and later ‘white hispanic’ gunning down a black baby with skittles was just downright ridiculous).

    So, his madness didn’t begin with ideas. It began with reality and the blatantly wrongful representation of reality by the deceitful media(that also reported that some beach in Chicago was closed down cuz of the heat when the real reason was black thuggery).

    Dylann sought explanations to the reality and misrepresentation of reality by using the internet to find answers. And he found out about black crime statistics, racial differences that lead to imbalance in crime, and Jewish control of the media(which even honest Jews admit is a reality). After all, media deception played a big role in the Iraq War and current problems in Ukraine.

    If Dylann had grown up in some nice white community or only knew wonderful nice token blacks, would he have ended up like this? Would he have sought out questions about racial differences?

    His troubles began with an awareness of reality. He NOTICED reality. He noticed that blacks commit a lot of crime, act like thugs, and cause much trouble. (Even Tommy Sotomayor will admit to high levels of black crime. Or just watch World Star Hip Hop).
    But he noticed that the media whitewashed this reality of black violence and crime. And he noticed all of this BEFORE he did ‘research’ on racial differences.

    In fact, what Dylann noticed is something even white Libs notice even though they won’t admit it(partly because they have the means to move away from the trouble and say the right words that will lead to socio-economic success that keeps them safe from black crime). After all, all this Stop and Frisk and gentrification and making homo/tranny stuff the center of new ‘leftism’ — a castrated leftism — has been about SWPL trying to create whitopias with some nice token blacks while driving dangerous blacks to other communities.
    Paradoxically, the correct rhetoric of ‘anti-racism’ and racial integration improves your chance of professional success that allows you to act more racially exclusive and live segregated lives in whitopias. To enter whitopia, you must say you hate ‘white privilege’ and love ‘diversity’. If you say you hate ‘diversity’, the more you’re likely to fail in your profession — as you’ll be fired and shunned — and then you’re be exiled from whitopia.

    Dylann’s question was relevant. He noticed that affluent and privileged whites were creating Worlds of Their Own. Safe zones in suburbs or cities. But what about poor whites who are left behind?

    He called out on the hypocrisy of reality. Libs say ‘racism’ is bad, but they do everything to live in whitopias. They elected Clinton who locked up lots of blacks. NY Libs want Manhattan to be safe but they pick on Ferguson.


    1. Dylann’s rage was about the ‘left-behind white blues’. If you’r white and educated and make good money, you can live in San Fran or Portland. But what about less fortunate whites who must suffer at the hands of whites?

      So, Dylann’s madness began with his noticing of reality, not with his reading of controversial or alternative ideas. If anything, he turned to those ideas ONLY BECAUSE the mass media have been piling on so many lies about race, crime, and etc. by highlighting rare instances of ‘white on black violence’–often in self-defense by cops–while ignoring all the black-on-white violence.

      If anything, the sheer hysteria of the media about Dylann suggests that they are really scared cuz there is some truth in Dylann’s ‘manifesto’ about media duplicity.

      So, before anyone about ‘how HBD ideas might have contributed to Dylan’s rage’, we need to ask ‘how did reality and distortion of reality by the media feed into Dylann’s rage?’

      Dylann saw the awful reality and then noticed the distortion of reality by the venal media that never tell the truth.

      The primary cause of Dylann’s madness was reality and the dishonesty about reality by the media. He sought out some HBD stuff because he wanted to learn some truth about what was happening.
      He began searching sites like CoCC only because he knew the reality all around him and because he didn’t see the reality reflected in the media.
      When he began to look around for answers, he noticed that his local reality wasn’t isolated but part of a large pattern that now encompasses Europe itself. But then, Europe is also in denial of reality and deception about reality. It’s a place where is it is considered wrong and strange for Europeans to say that Europe belongs to Europeans.

      Now, what Dylann did was evil and crazy. And he has mental issues. But he wasn’t totally cuckoo. A part of him could see the reality and think about it. But the side of him that was mad made him act horribly with the knowledge he had.

  8. One of your most truthful and honest videos to date. Well said.

  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

  10. For a Black racist manifesto, read Soul On Ice by Eldridge Clever. He was especially fond of raping white women. Like Malcolm X he later rejected Black racism and thought the real problem in America was class warfare not racism. A lot of black guys really dig that white stuff though.

  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

  12. (Sorry, I deleted above as the only way to correct a couple of typos).

    Dylan's own observations were inarguable. His research unearthed irrefutable facts backed up by evidence such as FBI crime stats. So the "diagnosis" of the problem was correct in many aspects. But he crossed the line into crazy land with his putative "cure" which was as unjust as the black on white murders he decried and which predictably strengthened a cause of the disease he diagnosed - media fanning a false narrative of blacks in danger from whites. Blacks are provably SAFER among whites as they demonstrate in the US by moving into white enclaves whenever possible and pouring into Europe from Africa. Even Jesse Jackson on his one honest day admitted that when he heard footsteps following him in the dark he was relieved to turn and see a white man

  13. Gun grabbing, race baiting, Zio distracting hoax