Saturday, January 31, 2009

Woman Plans Murder of Husband



Here is a news story about a man who blames himself for his wife’s plot to murder him:

Tim Kenealy was in court to support his wife Zoe as she was given seven years behind bars for attempting to take out a contract on his life with thousands of pounds of borrowed money.
He put his head in his hands as he heard Judge Gregory Stone sentence her for the “cynical and cruel” plot which saw her hand £3,000 to a neighbour to pay for the killing.

Zoe had an affair with the next door neighbor. While she was having an affair, she decided that if she had her husband killed she could collect the insurance money. Her bad boy lover agreed to do it if she paid him 3,000 pounds. As she did not have the money, she talked her poor husband into taking out a home improvement loan. She used this money to hire the hit man. The plot was foiled and she was found guilty of conspiracy to murder.

Since she was a woman, she was only sentenced to three and a half years*. (I imagine a man would receive life in prison.)

*she was sentenced to 7 years, but the judge said she will only serve 3.5 years.

Meanwhile, Timmy was supporting his dear wife during the trial. He made all sorts of rationalizations for her behavior and blamed himself for “taking his eye of the ball” in their relationship. His wife Zoe seemed to agree, and she stated the he smothered her. “Smothering” means that he probably showered her with love and affection and she got sick and bored of it. So she went next door and got herself a bad boy lover.

Tim pleaded for the judge to show mercy to his wife during the trial. And when she was sentenced he cried like a little bitch. He swore that she was misunderstood and he would stand by his wife forever.

So I was curious and I wanted to see a picture of Zoe. I figured if a man was willing to forgive not only adultery, but an attempt to murder him, she must be some stunning beauty. Below is the picture of her.






Now for the rest of the story –

While in prison, Zoe found some new lover. She sent her husband a “Let’s just be friends” letter that arrived a week before Christmas.

I don’t know if I should laugh or cry at this man, Guys, never allow ANYONE to treat you badly. ALWAYS maintain your respect.

Friday, January 30, 2009

PSA - Watch This Video



As part of Starbuck’s Pledge5 campaign, I have been passionate about educating people. One area that seems to be difficult for some women is what to do if you don’t like a video? As I am not a woman, I thought I would invite Molly to provide a woman’s perspective on strategies and coping techniques with dealing with a video that you don’t like.

Molly is a student at OSU who is a Chemical Engineering and Math major. As part of her rigorous curriculum she has developed sophisticated techniques with dealing with such issues. I have asked her to share with us her insights into this issue.

Please watch this video before you watch any of my other videos. This video will give you invaluable tools and techniques in coping with ideas that you might find objectionable.

Remember, together we CAN make a difference. YES WE CAN!

A Trillion Dollar Stimulus



Americans United for Change is a liberal think tank that is airing ads in support of the trillion dollar stimulus package. You can see one of their ads below.



We entered this economic crisis due to spending more as a nation than we produce. So, obviously, the cure is to spend even more! I suppose that such people also believe that the way to cure a heroin addiction is to give the addict even more hits of heroin. Makes sense to me.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Silencing Political Speech



I consider the censorship of political speech to be one of the worst manifestations of tyranny. Once we are not allowed to speak as free men, all our other freedoms are doomed.

This subject has been in the news recently concerning Obama’s spat with Rush Limbaugh. While I am not a huge fan of Rush, I absolutely believe he has the right to criticize the government. The fact that Obama suggested otherwise was quite chilling.

While I was thinking about blogging about this topic today, I was notified by YouTube that my Race and Illegitimacy video was removed. The video discussed the issue of how illegitimacy is not based on race, but it is produced by government policies that enable the behavior. While welfare destroyed the Black father in the 1960s, child support has been destroying the White father in recent years.

The topic of a lack of fathers has been debated in many countries. Obama has often talked about the need of fathers. So this is not exactly a new issue.

Well, it seems some unwed mother (she admitted her child was illegitimate) started to spam vulgar comments on my video's comment section. I usually don’t care what people write as I usually find the crude comments to be amusing. (I especially find it funny when people accuse me of being a virgin.)

It seems that that this strong, independent, unwed mother went crying to Daddy YouTube instead of rebutting my argument. Her poor little feelings were hurt that I suggested illegitimacy was toxic to a culture. So like any tolerant and enlightened person, she decided to try to silence those she disagrees with.

I have sent an appeal to YouTube. And I also have registered a complaint against her account for malicious flagging.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

RAMZPAUL Interview



I was honored to be a guest on the Jimmy Z radio show. We discussed my videos and politics. It was a lot of fun.

The interview can be found at:

http://thejimmyzshow.blogspot.com/

I was interviewed during the Wednesday, January 29th show (Part 2).

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

California bankrupt - may issue IOUs



It looks like California will run out of money by February 1. And unless Uncle Obama comes up with the money, the state will start to issue IOUs as payment to state workers.

Of course, California is hopelessly bankrupt. As they have opened the immigration floodgates, the tax revenue does not begin to pay for the free education and health care provided to illegal immigrants. Most of the people in California are on the state’s teat. The primary employers include the prison industry and the broken school system. And when expenses exceed tax revenue, it is not difficult to see the end result. California is no longer credit worthy to borrow more funds. In a sense, California is a microcosm of America. The key difference is that the State of California cannot print money like the Federal government.

However, this did raise an interesting question for me. If California is willing to pay in IOUs, would the IRS be willing to accept IOUs as a form of payment? As this web site is dedicated to education, I thought I would call the IRS and see if they would accept IOUs from the citizens. After all, what is good for the goose should be good for the gander.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Pelosi wants stimulus money for abortions



Per the DrudgeReport:

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi boldly defended a move to add birth control funding to the new economic "stimulus" package, claiming "contraception will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government."

Have you guys seen this picture of Nancy? Yikes! This is an image that will help prevent conception.

Nancy is a 68 year old limousine liberal from the Bay Area. She is considered to be one of the richest people in Congress. She is stuck in some time warp in which she thinks it is perpetually 1968.

While she wants to ensure that the stimulus loot does not go to White construction workers, she is interested in funneling this loot to her aging feminist hags at Planned Parenthood. The theory is that funding these useless bureaucrats somehow will reduce illegitimacy. The fact that this strategy has been employed over the last 40 years and has been a spectacular failure is of no concern to Nancy. Maybe she is just getting senile.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Sunday Morning at OSU


My daughter told me that OSU now has some of the most “progressive” restrictions concerning smoking in the United States. Possession of cigarettes (yes, just having cigarettes let alone smoking) can result in your arrest and a $250 fine. When I was a university student such a regulation would have met with immediate civil disobedience. Now college students are quite docile and willing to obey the government.

Of course, when my daughter told me of the restriction I knew we would have to smoke in the middle of the university court yard. So this Sunday morning we sat on campus smoking cigarettes. We received some dirty looks, but no one called the police on us.

My son held the camera for a bit and he was getting bored (so the footage is wobbly). But thanks Alex, for doing this.

Anyway, this is just a video of a father and daughter smoking cigarettes in a park. Not a profound video. Just a memory of a time past when the State did not attempt to control all aspects of our lives.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Pledge5 - War Against Nitrogen!



This video is to raise awareness of the dangers of nitrogen which can be found in our atmosphere. Many of you might not be aware that this deadly gas can be found in our atmosphere. This gas is colorless and odorless. This deadly gas is harmful to all - especially to women and people of color.

Here is the official Starbuck’s video that inspired me:


As part of Starbuck’s Pledge5 campaign (in support of Obama – Bless His Holy Name) I plan to help raise awareness of nitrogen. I will not rest until the war against nitrogen has been won.

The fight against nitrogen will not be easy. But together we can WIN this fight! YES WE CAN!

Friday, January 23, 2009

White Men Need Not Apply



Robert Reich, Obama’s economic advisor, recently made the following comments to Congress:

I am concerned, as I’m sure many of you are, that these jobs not simply go to high-skilled people who are already professionals or to white male construction workers. … I have nothing against white male construction workers. I’m just saying that there are a lot of other people who have needs as well. … Criteria can be set so that the money does go to others, the long term unemployed minorities, women, people who are not necessarily construction workers or high-skilled professionals.



Of course, if Reich had mentioned any other demographic group, he would now be out of a job. But he realizes that White Males are a safe target. We are expected to produce and maintain civilization while others loot.

This is an example of what occurs under socialism. Instead of rewarding people based on their ability, we reward people based on their need. The people who have the ability are sacrificed for the NEEDS of others. Jobs are given not based on ability, but on need and government pull. To excel in socialism you need not talent, but government connections.

Of course, physical reality does not care about need. A bridge will only stand if it is designed and built by competent men.

The irony is that the people, who built this country, are now dispossessed. And the supposed goal of judging a man by his character, not his skin color was not really true. Reich plans to judge a man by his skin color to determine who receives this government loot (i.e. stimulus).

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

I Pledge! (unedited version)




The other day, I had lunch with Demi Moore on her Gulf Stream jet. We discussed various topics such as global warming and the plight of the poor in Africa. Anyway, we hit some turbulence and our Perrier-Jouet Champagne spilled on the floor and the imported caviar flew up in the air! Poor Demi was picking caviar out of her hair the rest of the flight as we discussed ending world hunger. I tell you, we never laughed so hard.

Sometime during our laughter, Demi suddenly had a great idea – we need to make a video showing how we rich and famous promise to serve and obey our glorious leader – Obama. Creating videos showing how much we care about poverty and social issues is a traditional away that we elite help the world. The last time we did such a thing was when we tearfully sang “We are the World”. (These sorts of things also make a nice tax write off, but that is another matter.)

So we got together with our rich and famous friends and we put together this video. We hope that this video will help to end slavery, world hunger and fashion disasters! Anyway, it made us feel good inside as we had an African America, an Asian, a Hispanic, a single mom and a homosexual in the video. We are so diverse we can hardly stand it!

But, mostly, we want to raise awareness of the importance of raising awareness.

Doom and Gloom?



Pat Buchanan recently argued that the Republican Party is in danger of going the way of the Whig Party due to changing demographics.

The argument is as follows – the Republican Party is primarily supported by White Americans. Due to Third World immigration and low White birth rates, America is being transformed from a White nation. Non-Whites rarely support the Republican ideals such as limited government and personal responsibility. As such, the United States is morphing into a one party state (represented by the Democratic Party).

The problem with Pat’s thesis is that is pre-supposes that the Republican Party has been an advocate of freedom and liberty. While the GOP may talk a good line, in reality the GOP has governed in such a manner to greatly increase the scope and power of the State. Spending has gone through the roof while our constitutional liberties have been shredded through odious legislation such as the Patriot Act.

So while the Republicans may never again gain national power – does it really make a difference? We have been headed toward a socialist/fascist model of government no matter which party governed. Obama promises to continue to take us down this course which will lead to disaster.

But is it all doom and gloom?

The failure of the Neocons in the Republican Party (such as Bush, Cheney, etc) has opened the door to fresh ideas and blood. The libertarian ideas of Ron Paul and his supporters may start to gain more traction within the GOP. And ideas are much more important long term than holding temporary power. For ideas can shape a generation and a nation.

All government can do is tax, kill and destroy. Government is unable to create or to produce. Without the productive people, the parasite of government will die without a host to feed upon. We do not need government – government needs us.

The old America is dead and the maggots are feeding upon the corpse. Once they have devoured the corpse, the maggots and their ideologies will die. We saw this happen in the Soviet Union. The once mighty empire quickly fell. Such will happen to the United States.

But from that death, new life will spring. Liberty and Freedom will take root and we will experience a new day. Communism, totalitarianism, feminism, fascism and Marxism cannot endure as it violates basic human nature.

We need to see beyond the dark storm clouds and realize that such darkness is temporary. For unseen behind the clouds is always a blue sky.


Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Wedding Day - Obama Marries American Women



The United States Presidency has changed radically since the founding of the country. Fearing the rise of a king or a dictatorship the founding fathers wanted to check the power of the Executive branch of the government. Hence the Constitution was created to limit the power of government – especially the Executive Branch. The Founders did not want another king.

The original office of the Presidency was quite weak. The majority of powers were delegated to the States. The Governorship of a state (such as New York) was considered to be much more powerful and influential that the Presidency. This was reflected in Thomas Jefferson’s tombstone in which he listed being governor of New York but did not bother to mention that he was President. The Presidency simply was not that important. The States had the power.

Over the years the Presidency grew in power. Lincoln was the first President to exert the Federal authority over the states. After the Civil War, it was clear that the States has become subservient to the Federal government. From that moment on, “The United States of America” has always been somewhat a misnomer. For the states had very little remaining power over the central government.

The power of the Presidency further gained power under FDR. FDR wielded power as if he were the big leader in a fascist or socialist command economy. (This is why liberal historians tend to revere both Lincoln and Roosevelt – they love centralized control.)

We are now at the point in history in which the Presidency bears little resemblance as to its original Constitutional Powers. In many ways, we have returned to the concept of an elected king or a dictator. Our society assumes that it is proper for the President to wage war without Congressional consent, lead the economy, etc. All of these notions would have horrified the Founders. We were to be a nation of free men – not under the whims of an elected dictator or king.

The inauguration now resembles the coronation of a King or an Imperial Leader. Gone are the days in which the President was just considered one citizen among many. He is now the Big Chief, the King, and more.

With the rise of female voters, we have seen the transformation of the President to that of a surrogate husband and father. It is no accident that the strongest demographic support for Obama was among women, specifically single women. For Obama represents the ideal that the government can act as a substitute for husbands and fathers. The government now usurps the role of provider and protector for many women.

If a woman should have a child out of wedlock, it is the government that will ensure money is provided via child support or welfare. It is the government that provides the funding for many jobs that employ women. It is the government that symbolically acts as a protector of women through gender specific laws such as VAWA.

The lady pictured here represents this ideal. The symbolism of having Obama’s name painted over her uterus can not be missed. She is declaring that her real husband is Obama and the father is the government. She only needed her official husband for his sperm. Her real daddy and husband will be the federal government.

I always thought the hype and feel of this inauguration seemed strange. Then watching the rapture in the female reporter eyes and manner I had a realization – for many women this inauguration represents a wedding. A symbolic wedding of Obama to women. He represents their new husband and Baby Daddy. He will provide for and protect them in this cruel world.

Unfortunately, government tends to be an abusive husband and father. But many women tend to stay with their abusers. This is no exception.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Love, Sacrifice and Need



I am currently reading Atlas Shrugged again. Atlas Shrugged was the seminal novel by Ayn Rand that helped to shape and define the Libertarian movement. (Although, Ayn Rand always considered herself to be an Objectivist, not a Libertarian.) Atlas Shrugged is considered to be one of the most influential novels of the 20th century. It falls into the must read category.

The novel is set in America during a time of economic decay. As the economy falters, the government intervenes with more programs and controls. These controls further damage the economy which leads to even more government controls. The government is always preaching about the need for sacrifice and the public good. Sound familiar? We are now living this novel.

However, while the novel did deal with economic matters, the prime focus was on the spiritual. For just as we have looters and moochers in the economy, we have people who loot the spirit. These are the people that claim that their “need” is justification for their claim on a man’s life.

One of Ayn Rand’s key concepts was “Sanction of the Victim.” The premise is that evil is a parasite on the good and can only exist if the good tolerates it. The question is – what if those who produce cease to allow their work and life to be looted? What if we should shrug off the notion that life is to live for others?

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Stepford Wife Neighborhood Hell



A hilarious story about a woman that created a commotion when she placed various mannequin heads on her property. This offended the delicate sensibilities of the local sisterhood. Did they confront the offending lady and express their displeasure? No. They did what most strong and independent women do - they called the government for help.

Anyone that has lived in suburbia knows that it is populated by these hideous busybodies (invariably women) who think they know best how their neighbors should live their lives. Typically, neighborhood covenants are formed to prevent any variation of style from the norm. God forbid if anyone should ever have a thought or style that is outside what is fashionable at the moment.

So the neighborhood women picked up their phones and bitched to the City Councilman and the police. (Luckily, crime must be almost non-existent for the police to spend so much time on this mannequin head case.)

The City Councilman, Jack Benson, should have told the women to shut up and mind their own business. However, he could not resist the opportunity to ride in on his white horse to save these poor damsels in distress. He adopted the appropriate indignation and stated that something must be done “for the children’s sake”. (I often wonder how these saps can spout these clich├ęs with a straight face.)

The police have charged her with littering and disturbing the peace, so all should end well. The little proto-fascists can rest easy knowing they protected the neighborhood from mannequin heads on the roof.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

29 years old and 10 illegitimate children



Here is a heartwarming story of a 29 year old Flint, Michigan woman who already has 10 illegitimate children. She survives via leeching off the tax payer and private charities. And without a sense of irony, she describes herself as a “stay at home mom.”

She boasts that her children are good and on the school’s honor roll (which in Flint Michigan means they have not knifed a teacher). In reality, without a father we know statistically that most of these boys will end up in prison or an early grave. The girls will probably have children before their 15th birthday.

Society is reaching a breaking point in which this behavior can no longer be tolerated. Civilization, and all of its comforts that we take for granted, cannot continue with children raised in a feral manner. We need to end subsidizing this behavior through welfare and child support, or we will soon return to the jungle. And as much as feminists may bitch about Western Civilization, I don’t think they will like how women are treated when the jungle returns.

Friday, January 16, 2009

Marriage and the Aging Feminist



Lori Gottlieb wrote an essay in the March 2008 edition of the Atlantic Monthly entitled, “Marry Him! - The case for settling for Mr. Good Enough” The premise of the essay is that it is a mistake for women to wait too long to get married.

Looking at Miss Gottlieb web site, you can see that she is a 40 something petite white girl. While she is still attractive, I bet she was quite hot in her 20s and early 30s. However, when she dated at that age, she never found a man that measured up to her standards. As such, she found herself pushing 40 without a man, or a baby.

Unfortunately, Miss Gottlieb decided to become an unwed mother. And she is just now realizing that raising a child without a father is not quite as glamorous as it is shown on TV and the movies.

So choosing a man based on love is no longer a requirement for her. She is looking for someone to help her with her bastard child. As she wrote:

Even women who settle but end up divorced might be in a better position than those of us who became mothers on our own, because many ex-wives get both child-support payments and a free night off when the kids go to Dad’s house for a sleepover. Never-married moms don’t get the night off.

Yikes. I am sure that paragraph will do wonders in catching a suitable man.

Of course, Miss Gottlieb is attractive enough to find many men willing to marry her. The problem is that her ideal of “settling” probably doesn’t include an auto mechanic from Mississippi. She still wants a handsome and rich man than can take her on fun trips across Europe. But that begs the question – why would such a man want to marry such a woman when he is in the position to have much younger and prettier options? Does a rich and handsome man really want to be looked as as a source of babysitting and future child support payments?

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Teens, Nudity and Insanity in America



The sexual insanity continues in America.

Three teenage girls who allegedly sent nude or semi-nude cell phone pictures of themselves, and three male classmates in a Greensburg Salem High School who received them, are charged with child pornography.Police said the girls are 14 or 15, and the boys charged with receiving the photos are 16 or 17. None are being identified because most criminal cases in Pennsylvania juvenile courts are not public."It was a self portrait taken of a juvenile female taking pictures of her body, nude," said Capt. George Seranko of the Greensburg Police Department.

WTF?

We live in a society in which schools constantly promote “safe sex” to children, and yet, a girl that takes a nude picture is arrested for child pornography. It would have literally been legal for these same girls and boys to engage in group sex, but it is illegal for the same girls to take topless pictures of themselves?


This is the same society that sexualizes children (especially girls) at an early age with Bratz dolls and suggestive T-shirts (see display). This is a society that places its highest value on the attainment of the orgasm. According to what we see in movies and television, the purpose of life is simply chasing one orgasm after another. And, yet, we suddenly become Puritans once teens exchange nude pictures with each other?

Our society is like a heroin addict who lectures someone over the dangers of smoking.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Hollywood is Gay



SPIDER-MAN creator Stan Lee is to unveil the world’s first gay superhero.
High school basketball star Thom Creed hides his developing superpowers along with his sexuality.

Former Marvel Comics boss Stan, 86 — who also created the Hulk and the X-Men — will unleash the character in an hour-long TV drama being shot in the US.

Fabulous! Just what young boys want to see in a comic – a superhero that takes it up the you-know-what.

According to a report from GLAAD (a homosexual advocacy group), there are 22 series featuring 35 openly gay characters for the Fall 2008 TV season. Do we really need a gay superhero on top (no pun intended) of that?

Currently, 80% of the network television audience is women. Straight men are simply not interested in television anymore. The problem is that many of the Hollywood writers are gay males that simply do not understand heterosexual men. Straight men (and boys) want adventure stories in which the hero wins the love of a girl.

Sex in the City is a popular show written primarily by homosexual men. As such, the female characters actually behave in a manner more consistent with the urban, gay lifestyle. This includes an obsession with promiscuous and anonymous sex devoid of emotion or attachment. The interesting thing is that this story line is popular with a female audience.

The problem for Hollywood is that 95% of men are straight. And the current crop of sitcoms (such of Sex in the City) falls flat with us. And the idea that a gay SuperHero will be popular with guys (who are the primary audience for this genre) is absurd.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

College Girl Sells Virginity



Here is a story of a Woman’s Study Major (snicker) who put her virginity up for auction. Amazingly, this horse face whore has apparently found some loser to pay her 3.7 million dollars to have sex with her.

Oh, and this little darling is planning to get her master’s degree in Family and Marriage Therapy (I kid you not.) So after she graduates there is a good possibility that she will work as an “expert” advisor to a Family Court.

If you happened to be a young married guy that gets served divorce papers, you might be lucky enough to have this darling as the expert witness in determining who gets custody of your children. Yes, future Family Court judges will undoubtedly rely on Miss Dylan’s sober expertise in evaluating healthy relationships.

Real life is funnier than fiction.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Teacher Has Sex with 13 year old



Here is another in a latest in a string of stories of a female school teacher having sex with a student. There have been so many of these stories it is hard to track them all. Of course, it is considered sexy, funny and edgy when a female teacher sleeps with a student. Such a woman is never called a pedophile and people speak of her in a sympathetic manner as some poor lady who needs help. If a male teacher should sleep with a 13 year old girl, he would be facing life in prison.

In this case Christine A. McCallum, 29, had sex over 300 times with a student. The sex started when she got him drunk at 13 years of age and continued until he dropped her sorry ass when he was 15. (It seems he wanted to have some fun with girls his own age.).

Her poor sap of a husband (pictured here) is standing by her in court. What an idiot. She screws around with a child and he is still supporting her like some Beta Male. Ugh. I can’t imagine she ever had sex with him.

After her legal troubles are over (which will probably include probation and a trip to Oprah), do you think she will stand by her husband? She will be long gone with half his money.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Women's Magazines - Sex, Diets and Weddings



Looking at a typical bookstore’s magazine rack is revealing in the difference between men and women. The magazine targeted towards men focus on cars, sports, technology, hobbies, money, business, politics and adventure. All of these topics tend to be focused outward.

Women’s magazines tend to focus on sex, diets, fashion, weddings and celebrity gossip. Most of these topics tend to be focused inward on the self. (In fact, there is a woman’s magazine entitled Self).

Despite years of feminism taught in the schools and preached non-stop in the mainstream media, women and men tend to gravitate towards traditional roles. Women dream of being the center of attention in a big wedding. Men dream of climbing mountains and driving fast cars.

Of course, there are exceptions. I suppose that there are women who dream of climbing mountains and driving fast cars. However, is there a heterosexual man that dreams about looking fabulous at a wedding?

One of the failures of feminism is trying to deny that men and women are different. As much as they try to force little boys to play with dolls and encourage little girls to act adventurous, nature always trumps social engineering.


Saturday, January 10, 2009

Heartbreak and the Nice Guy



One of the problems Nice Guys have is maintaining a healthy relationship. As female approval defines a Nice Guy’s life, he tends to be needy and clingy. This pushes the girl away and then he is heartbroken. This is a pattern I have observed with many Nice Guys.

Here is a quote from a guy (and my response) that was relating his problem of recovering from a break up. He had all of the typical Nice Guy behaviors – need for female validation, neediness, a lack of control, etc.

Nice Guy: The way things broke off really damaged my self esteem -- I just didn't measure up for her, and she didn't really care about my aspirations at some point.

That’s because she does not like you.

I don’t mean to be harsh. But sometimes we guys come up with a thousand different rationalizations rather than just facing the obvious. (I have been guilty of this many times.)

This story is one that has been repeated a million times.

She starts with a high interest level in you. Over time she starts to get bored. As she starts to pull away, you become insecure and needy. This further repels her as women naturally are attracted to strong and confident men. She eventually meets another guy and they become “just friends”. Then one night she has sex with him. She tells herself that this was totally unexpected because she is really not that kind of girl – the emotions just overwhelmed her. Then she starts desiring him and feeling resentful towards you. At this point you notice she is no longer sexually or emotionally responsive towards you. You panic and become more insecure and needy. This further pushes her away. Finally, she gives you the dreaded “we need to talk” line. During this talk she will typically tell you that she will always love you but she just needs some time to sort out her feelings. You end up angry and heartbroken. She ends up in the new guy’s bed that night.

That is the pattern. I have seen it a million times.

Nice Guy: I need to build my self esteem/self-confidence, lose my fear of loneliness, lose the panicky sense that I need to find a girl to validate me and support me the way she did, and start to plan my future without catering to someone else.

Build you self esteem independent of a girl’s approval of you. Find your passion in life and follow it.

Friday, January 9, 2009

Liskula Cohen to sue RAMZPAUL?



Here is a story in which some washed up model is suing a blog because some anonymous poster called her a skank and a ho. Liskula Cohen, 36, is seeking a court order that would force Google to reveal the person or persons behind the postings so she can hold them accountable with a defamation lawsuit.

Jeez… if I could sue everyone that posted a mean comment on my YouTube blog, I would be quite rich.

The blog is called NY Skanks. The blog consists of about 3 posts. The blog looks like it was created by a special education student as a school project. Me thinks something smells fishy about that blog. (And, if the lawyers of Liskula Cohen are reading this, I am NOT referring to Miss Cohen’s hygiene.) I wouldn’t be surprised if Miss Cohen was behind the blog as a publicity stunt in an attempt to revive a waning career.

Anyway, Cohen does not need to force Google to determine the identity of some anonymous posters. She can sue me! For I am on record as claiming that Liskula Cohen is a petulant old woman with a big nose! How is that for defamation!


Thursday, January 8, 2009

Cystic Fibrosis - Politically Incorrect Disease



Students at the University of Ottawa decided to cease fund raising efforts when they were horrified to learn that a cure might benefit White Men. The students failed to grasp the irony of the situation as they made the proclamation from an institution that was made possible through the efforts of White Men.

Could you imagine if a student union decided not to fund research into a disease because it primarily benefited African-Americans or Jews? The outrage and gnashing of teeth would be non-stop on the mainstream media. The students would be immediately expelled and be sent to re-education camps, (aka “sensitivity training”).

I imagine that there were probably some White guys that went along with this nonsense. They probably hoped that if they appeared to be nice and diverse they could get into the pants of some cute girls on the fund raising committee. What they fail to realize is that everyone (including the girls) look at them as a bunch of pathetic self-hating losers. Blah… Nice Guys will be the end of Western Civilization.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

How to Deal with Conflict



The RBC Technique

Nice Guys tend to have the problem with dealing directly with conflict. Any time there is a conflict a Nice Guy will typically acquiesce in attempt to maintain the peace. Of course, there is a price to this submission – the conflict never gets resolved. Typically, a Nice Guy will slink off after avoiding a confrontation and lick his wounds as a victim. Then instead of dealing with the problem directly, he will express his anger if a passive-aggressive manner.

I knew a married woman at work who was intelligent, funny and quite pretty. However, she had the unfortunate habit of spending much of her time in an inappropriate manner with other men. Her husband was the typical Nice Guy. He provided well, was kind and considerate. He also had the Nice Guy trait of avoiding conflict. So instead of dealing with the situation directly, he just pouted and became resentful. According to her, he was always acting in a passive-aggressive manner.

Years later I learned that she divorced this guy. So his Nice Guy attempt to appease and pacify his wife actually resulted in the thing he feared the most – her leaving him.

This is a common scenario I have seen repeated many times. And this Nice Guy aversion to conflict is repeated in all aspects of life, not just relationships. I have seen Nice Guys in a work environment avoid conflict at all costs and then complain and bitch about their woeful situation all day. Nice Guys are always victims.

The technique I developed to deal with conflict is what I call RBC – Repeat, Boundaries, Consequences. I am sure that this is a variation of some other ideas, but this is what I used over the years to overcome my Nice Guy syndrome.

A few notes concerning each step:


Repeat (R)

This first step is to repeat back the behavior that you find objectionable.

As an example, I was on a international conference call and I could hear someone mutter the word “idiot” in regards to what I said. A typical Nice Guy approach would be to ignore the comment and sulk and pout. An Integrated Man approach is to directly deal with such a conflict.

As part of the “R” step, I immediate asked, “Do you just call me an idiot?”.

Such a response created instant silence. People who feel free to insult others usually are bullies who do not expect a response.

In the case of the married guy described above, the Repeat step would be do confront the wife with the objectionable act – “Did you have dinner with Tom?”

It is important to Repeat the specific action or behavior that you found objectionable so that the other person is clear as to the problem. (Clarity is a masculine trait, ambiguity is a feminine trait).

Boundary (B)
A Boundary is simply a definition of what behavior you will or will not tolerate. Typically we will get the behaviors we tolerate.

Nice Guys tend to have weak boundaries. They tend to allow people to walk over them in an attempt to maintain peace and keep their approval. Ironically, this attempt of appeasement tends to actually cause the other person to lose more respect in you.

In the real-life conference call example, I told the person who called me an idiot that I do not tolerate such disrespectful talk. This set a clear boundary. Simply setting a boundary will may times encourage someone to respect it.

In the married guy example, he should have told his wife in no uncertain terms that he would not tolerate her having dinner dates with other men. As a Nice Guy he was probably worried that setting such a boundary would cause his wife to get mad at him and leave him. The truth is that setting such boundaries probably would have caused her to gain respect of him and it could have saved the marriage.

No matter what the circumstance (business or personal) it is key that people understand your boundaries of acceptable behavior.

Consequence (C)

A boundary without a consequence is of no value. The consequence is the “teeth” that enforces the boundary. It is typically a type of IF-THEN clause.

Examples

– IF you talk to me again in such a manner, THEN I will end this conference call and refuse to conduct business with you

– IF you meet another man for dinner again, THEN I will divorce you

Stating the clear consequence requires balls. And as most Nice Guys desperately seek the approval of others (especially women) they usually lack the courage to act in an assertive manner.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Jews, Arabs and Entangling Alliances



As long as I can remember the Arabs and the Jews have been fighting in the Middle East. I can remember as a kid watching President Carter hosting Begin and Sadat as part of the Camp David accords. Supposedly, that summit was to bring a long lasting peace to the region. Of course, it didn’t work. The fighting and squabbling has continued over the past 30 years.


When I was a small child, I was attended a fundamentalist Baptist Church and school. The Church preached a dispensationalist theology. This theology basically claimed that we were living in the End Times and the Rapture would happen soon. I remember my third grade teacher telling us that while the bicentennial was approaching, it would not matter as Jesus was sure to come before 1976!

I remember reading Hal Lindsey’s The Late Great Planet Earth. This book was basically Dispensational pornography. It told of coming plagues, rivers of blood, marks of the beast and other stuff that I found cool as a young boy. Church might have been boring. But talk of all the coming gore and bloodshed was exciting! The Anti-Christ was like this really cool Darth Vader personae. I listened to Rapture and Tribulation sermons like a horny old man leers at an exotic dancer. I was transfixed.


As part of this theology, we were taught that the Jews were God’s special people. And not “special” as a euphemism for retarded, but special in that God loved them more than the rest of us. All the cool characters in the Bible were Jews – Abraham, David, Jesus, etc. Gentiles were always a somewhat second rate category of people.

The theology of the church was a lens in which we viewed political matters. As the Jews were the Apple of God’s eye, they must always be the “good guys” in any conflict. It was muttered in the church halls that those dirty Arabs must be the Satanic offspring of Cain.

While I stopped attending Church in my teen years, I started to get involve with Conservative thought. This was during the 1970s before it was cool to be a Conservative. NO ONE back then liked conservatives or the military. As a conservative, I discovered magazines such as National Review that continued with the near deification of Jews. So I found this to be quite comfortable and familiar. Jews were the good guys. Arabs were the terrorists. Nice and clear definitions.

As I got older, I started to wonder why the USA had to spend more of foreign aid on Israel versus any other country. I mean, I always rooted for Israel in any conflict, but why should my tax money buy arms for a foreign country?

I also could not understand why so many Jews were hateful and bigoted towards Christianity. After all, we were brothers in the same cause. And, yet, most Jewish organizations seemed to attack most Christian (and traditional Conservative) values. It also disturbed me as a neophyte Libertarian that many Jewish organizations were lobbying for restrictions on Free Speech, especially in regards to the Holocaust. I believed that The Truth never needs censors.

As I traveled and worked in foreign countries I discovered that Moslems were not the some crazed, Satanic creatures. The Moslems I encountered were kind, respectful and funny. Funny? How can a Moslem have a sense of humor? This shook my world view.

(As part of my penance, I created a video that illustrated the destructiveness of Christian Zionism.)

I now understand that people are people. Some of the nicest people I have meet have been Jews. Some of the biggest assholes have been Jews. The same hold true for Arabs and other ethnic groups.

The problem becomes when the United States unofficially assumes, like I did years ago, that Jews are good and Moslems are bad. This leads to entangling alliances. And such Alliances leads to events such as the September 11 terrorist attacks.

We as a country, need to remove ourselves from these ancient hatreds and fighting. Let them fight without our involvement.

Monday, January 5, 2009

Race and Illegitimate Children



I had an interesting comment in response to my How to Eliminate Bastard Children video. The comment was in regards to race and illegitimacy. The comment is as follows:


Hmm, you have some interesting points - i was especially interested in your discussion of inflation and deflation.
Now, having watched several of your videos, I am disturbed at your characterisations of those who are not white American males.
I have frequently heard you use the words "uncivilised", "animal", "savage" to describe non-whites and foreigners.
I suggest you check your facts. Why do you think single parent families and are exclusively an african-american and not a poverty issue?

I stand by my use of the term “animals”. I used the same term in regards to British people in my video “British Culture Flushed Down the Toilet”. As such, I believe that people of any race can be relegated to the level of an animal. In fact, all children are born as basic animals. What is required to turn us into humans is civilization. Without civilization people just live an animal existence – eating, sleeping and fucking. There are no higher values such as beauty, art, philosophy, compassion, mercy, reason, etc. with such people. They live as animals in the wild.

Throughout history, children become civilized through the family. Without a mother or a father it is difficult for a child to become a civilized human. The child will most likely remain in a feral state.

And in areas in which Fatherhood is unknown, the society quickly collapses back to the jungle.

When I lived in Michigan, the old joke was – What is the most confusing holiday in Detroit? Answer – Father’s Day. The joke works because it is based on a truth – it is rare for a child in Detroit to have a father. Detroit is a pure Matriarchy in which women rule almost every household and almost all the social workers are women. Children are raised without fathers. The results are devastating.

It is tempting to say this is a Black problem (since Detroit is almost 100% Black). However, years ago the Black family was intact. So what happened?


In the 1960s the Great Society programs introduced massive welfare into the inner cities with the suppose goal of eliminating poverty. While poverty was not eliminated, the program did successfully eliminate fathers. For while women once depended upon men for financial support, big Sugar Daddy government took over this role. Now a girl could whelp bastard child after bastard child and not have to worry about a man to provide financial support. Big Daddy government would be the surrogate father. As a result, Black illegitimacy soared.


Now we are seeing a similar trend among the White community. The introduction of No Fault divorce and child support has enabled White women to breed bastard children. Where as once being an unwed mother was a source of shame, now it is a source of pride. And Big Daddy government enables the removal of fathers through a forcible transfer of money from the father to the mother. The results are the same as we saw in the Black community years ago. White children (see England for a prime example) are being raised in a feral state. In England the breakdown of the family has become the number one social issue.

A friend of mine is a mother of four children. She related a tale in which one of her clients was shocked that all of her children had the same father. The young girl couldn’t imagine that a woman could have multiple children with only one Baby Daddy.

So while the White community might have once snickered over the rampant illegitimacy of Blacks, those days are long gone. We now see that the social destruction is not based on race, but based on a government policy that rewards illegitimacy.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Amtrak arrests man for taking photos



Photographer Duane Kerzic was arrested by the Amtrak Police for trespassing when he refused to delete pictures of trains. Kerzic was photographing trains as part of Amtrak’s annual contest for photos of Amtrak trains.


This story has all the ingredients that you would find in some banana republic:

A decrepit socialist railroad – check
A second rate thug acting as a cop – check
A government frightened of its own people - check


Kudos for Mr. Kerzic for refusing to submit to the government thug. Most men would simply obey in order not to get into trouble. Mr. Kerzic demonstrated that he is a man of integrity.

True freedom means freedom from the government.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Mainstream Journalists Suck



The online Wall Street Journal published a column from Paul Mulshine of the Newark Star-Ledger in which Mulshine bitched and moaned over the loss of “real” journalism in favor of bloggers. (The irony that he is bitching about bloggers on a blog seems to escape Mr. Mulshine).

The mainstream media is still trying to come to terms that intelligent people are now turning to the web to gather information. It seems that Mr. Mulshine and his ilk are reminiscing over the good old days when they acted as gatekeepers of information and had the power to exclude unpopular opinions. Those days are now over as people are able to carry their message without the mainstream media’s permission. Of course, this pisses off the government and their mainstream media lapdog.

Gone are the good old days in which being a journalist meant confronting the establishment and exposing corruption. Years ago, the primary qualifications to become a good reporter included the ability to write well and have a sense of dogged determination. Now the primary qualification seems to be large breasts and nice legs. Journalism has morphed into entertainment designed to keep the populace fat, dumb and happy. Could you imagine a journalist such a Katie Couric doing anything but getting on her knees to kiss some politician’s ass?

The advent of blogging has allowed people to be exposed to previously ignored topics. Many blogs were warning of the housing bubble long years ago. Meanwhile the mainstream media was just being a good laptop repeating the lies of Paulson and Bernanke.

Similarly, the Internet has allowed men to respond to feminism and male bashing that for years went unchallenged by the mainstream media. When JC Penny’s decided to air a male bashing ad, many bloggers including myself were able to respond to their obnoxious marketing. This created a stir that forced mainstream newspapers to respond to my counter video. The reporter could only describe the idea that men should object to such crap as “bizarre”. Based on her female dominated educational experienced, she could not simply get her head around that idea that some men may not choose to submit to such abuse.

The newspapers are dying. Good riddance.

Friday, January 2, 2009

The Motorcycle, The Thug and the Nice Guy





Many times I have encountered guys that seem to need to get permission from their wives or girlfriends to pursue their passions or hobbies. This type of character is typically what you see on television commercials and sitcoms. The guy is some doofus that has to check with the “old lady” before he can take a piss on his own.

What is sad is when you see this behavior in real life. Sadly, I have met such men that are such henpecked that they can’t live life without getting permission from their surrogate mother (wife or girlfriend.)

Below is a sample of a guy who has publically emasculated himself. This poor sap is giving up his beloved motorcycle based on the bitchy of his wife. This is typical nice guy behavior. These guys are so weak that they can’t imagine saying the word “No” to a woman. I bet his wife looks like a 300 pound hog.



















Then we have a story of this Mexican beauty queen babe:

















I imagine such a beauty has her pick of guys to hang with. Logically, she would probably choose a nice man that is kind, considerate and kind. Right? Well, not exactly. Here are the hombres that she decided to hang with. These guys were convicted of drug dealing and arms running. Think one of these guys would sell his motorcycle on eBay based on her demands?


The moral of this story is that a hot babe would much rather hang out with thugs than some wussy nice guy. And yet, paradoxically, Nice Guys think that acting in a passive and submissive manner will somehow win them acceptance from women.

Of course, while living a life of a thug will probably attract women, such a lifestyle usually ends with a trip to early grave or prison. The key is to live a life of integrity – respect women, but never allow yourself to be bullied or intimated. Always live true to yourself.

Thursday, January 1, 2009

PUAs are Nice Guys



In this video I explain how the Pick Up Artist (PUA) has the same premise as the Nice Guy.

A brief explanation of terms:

Nice Guy – A Nice Guy is a man that attempts to gain validation of his life through the approval of others (especially women). The typical Nice Guy will attempt to gain this approval through acting “nice”. A Nice Guy avoids confrontation and attempts to appease and pacify the women in his life.

The Nice Guy is scared to be his true self. He must always tailor his words and actions in an attempt to please others. Nice Guys tend to be frustrated in life and this frustration is manifested in passive-aggressive behavior.

PUA – A Pick Up Artist (PUA) is a guy that tries to manipulate women to gain sex. This typically involves creating an elaborate act (usually referred to as “game”) that specifies how a guy should talk, stand, eat, and walk in order to trick a woman into sex. As with a Nice Guy, the PUA gains his sense of self worth through the approval of women. The primary trait of a PUA is manipulation.

Integrated Man – An Integrated Man is a man who does not live for the approval of others. An Integrated Man strives to achieve his life goals independent of the approval of others.

An Integrated Man does not attempt to appease women for approval. An Integrated Man does not attempt to play a game in order to win the approval of a woman. An Integrated Man is comfortable with who he is and does not allow anyone to change him.